Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1134820090380070862
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
2009 Volume.38 No. 7 p.862 ~ p.869
Survey on the Performance Practices and the Opinions on School Foodservice Monitoring by Dietitians and Students¡¯ Parents in Ulsan Area
Bae Hee-Ja

Bae Hyun-Joo
Abstract
This research was performed to acquire fundamental data to be used in developing school foodservice monitoring programs by investigating the actual operational conditions and views of dietitians and students¡¯ parents on foodservice monitoring. A questionnaire was provided to the parents and the dietitians of 100 school foodservice establishments in Ulsan area for one month (June, 2007). The questionnaires of 51 foodservice establishments from dietitians and parents were collected (response rate 51%). The collected data from the questionnaires were statistically analyzed using the SAS package program. In terms of the study subjects, 98.0% of the school foodservices were direct managed. The knowledge of HACCP of the students¡¯ parents included ¡¯know well¡¯ (52.6%), ¡¯know a little bit¡¯ (8.8%), and ¡¯do not know¡¯ (38.6%). 90.2% of the subjects were monitoring school foodservice regularly. The performance rates of school foodservice monitoring by the students¡¯ parents were in the order of: inspecting food materials (95.4%), food preparation (92.7%), and cleaning and facilities sanitation (88.1%). Of the students¡¯ parent respondents, 64.1% received preliminary monitoring education regularly, in the order of inspecting food materials (70.9%), food preparation (67.5%), and cleaning and facilities sanitation (60.9%); menu planning (45.5%) was the most highly required item for preliminary education. The understanding degree, in terms of the foodservice preliminary education, was 3.10 points, and the effects evaluation scores of the preliminary education by the dietitians was 3.18 points out of 5 points. The evaluation results for both the importance and performance about the foodservice monitoring items, as evaluated by the students¡¯ parents, indicating that importance was higher than performance in 7 of the foodservice monitoring items. The highest item for both importance and performance was ¡¯food preparation¡¯. There were no differences between the importance and performance of the foodservice monitoring items, regardless of whether or not the students¡¯ parents had preliminary education, suggesting that the preliminary education of the students¡¯ parents was not effective so far. In conclusion, in order to maximize the effectiveness of students¡¯ parent foodservice monitoring programs, it is necessary that students¡¯ parents participate voluntarily and perform foodservice monitoring regularly. Also, the preliminary education should be offered prior to performing monitoring, considering the demands and the characteristic of the students¡¯ parents.
KEYWORD
foodservice monitoring, students¡¯ parents, preliminary monitoring education, importance, performance
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)